Analyses of Zaid Hamid’s Clarification

More than 50 % (1^st Half) of his above reply is completely irrelevant from the topic and he is asking a lot of questions instead of giving answers of above mentioned questions.

Zaid Hamid did not reply that why Pakistani media was reporting his name repeatedly as biggest follower of kazzab in 1996-97?  Were Pakistani News papers following any CIA propaganda against a “ future scholar “? Keep in mind that at time zaid zaman hamid was not famous as today, so why new papers were “harming his image”? and if we assume that audio tape was made as a scientific trick then why high court Lahore accepted it as an evidence in the trial and what about continuous reports against him in news papers of that time?

The only notable part of his reply is (Curse of Allah, angels and momineen be on those liars who claim to be "prophets" after Sayyadna Khatim un Nabiyyeen Muhemmed Rasul Allah (saw).Also cursed and Rajeem are those who follow such liar "prophets")

The most Important point  (recall kazzab’s claims in your mind again and read)

If a believer of kazzab says that he believes in Khatam e Nabuwat, he is right in his belief because according to them Yaousaf kazzab is not a new prophet but he is 2^nd return of Muhammad SAW ( naooz Billah). Keep in mind that kazzab is not a ‘new prophet’ for them but kazzab is same as Muhammad SAW ( naoozbillah)

Due to yusuf kazzab, khatam-e-nabuwat is not disturbed. It means that believer of yusuf kazzab (as 2^nd return of Muhammad SAW) can claim that he still believes in khatam-e-nabuwat.

Same in this sense, Zaid Hamid says that “curse on the false prophets” then he is not cursing on the kazzab as Kazzab is not a false prophet according to his belief. He is cursing on “false prophets” not the “true prophet” like kazzab( as kazzab is true prophet to him) Naoozbillah. When he says that Muhammad SAW is the last prophet then still he is not denying his belief as Kazzab is not a new prophet but he is Muhammad SAW( naoozbillah)

If some body blames you that you believe in Kazzab as prophet then what will be your rational reaction? You will immediately reply that “Curse of Allah on the yusuf  kazzab and his followers”.  Zaid Hamid never never said that curse of Allah on “yousaf kazzab” and his followers. Why? If he were to curse on yusuf kazzab directly then it was more convincing and after this all allegations on him become ineffective but he never said “curse on yusuf Kazzab”.

Another fact that will prove our claim that

in any of his videos while replying on allegations he never said the word “ yousaf kazzab”….why??  Did any body heard the word “yousaf  kazzab” from his mouth? Even he never said his name “yousuf” during the explanation because he knows that if he says “yousuf “ then it will be necessary to say  “kazzab” ( which means the biggest liar ) with his name as all Muslims say with the name of every false prophet.

Is this not shocking?

Because he does not want not to take the name of yusuf kazzab in insulting manners???. Try to search on youtube but you cannot find a single video in which he saying yusuf kazzab’s name)

Here is an example and see how zaid hamid by passes the original question put by a student in his recent program in Superior University Lahore at 5 jan 2010.

Ziad Hamid is demanding repeatedly sharia proof for the allegations on him but when did he provide any sharia proof when he blamed Senior Journalist Hamid Mir as CIA Agent in a live TV show? Ziad Hamid is blaming so many politicians in his almost every show (we know they are not innocent ) but sharia proof is still needed before allegations as Zaid Hamid needs in his own case. But he could not present even a single paper as a proof in his any program.

Zaid Hamid’s TV shows are sponsored?

There is another allegation on him that his tv shows are sponsored by some hidden resources and he pays tv channels to get his shows on air. It means that his shows are just like paid documentaries.

1- Zaid hamid started his TV shows on TV1 channel with the name of his company brasstracks which is a security services provider company owned by him in islam abad. Did you ever have seen any tv show whose name is based on a company name? How TV channels allowed him to advertise his own company name as the name of program in a show which is “not sponsored”?

His TV shows are recorded in brasstracks offices and then they are on aired after paying the on air time to the TV channels. TV channels are not showing their secret agreements to the public and it is a little hard to prove it but if we just analyze the situation we can reach to the story behind the scene.

An interesting comparison is given here between different popular Pakistani talk shows( political, defense analyses and current issues programs) and zaid hamid’s talk show

 

Watch the background and theme of all these shows( All above scenes are from different channels and different popular shows i.g Mere Mutabiq, Kamran Khan show, Capital Talk, Bolta Pakistan, Dunya Today, Lucman Show)

About these we know that they are 100% recorded (or even live aired) inside the tv channel’s studios

Now watch scenes from different programs of zaid hamid here

 

These are scenes from different programs or episodes of zaid hamid’s famous shows. Is this background and lighting plan ever seen in any talk show on any tv channel (or just an effort to hide the interior of his office)?. Some body can accept that these are studio recordings? And he claims TV channels are paying him instead of getting some thing. (but not allowing him to use studios for recording??)

Zaid Hamid ( The hero of ‘revival of khilafat and sharia’ only changes the fashionable girls and his suits in these programs) This issue will be discussed later why zaid hamid and his team is using girls & boys close interaction to attract youth while having a motto of revival of khilafat and sharia.  

2- Why TV channels are not giving enough time to General (R) Hameed Gul and Imran Khan who are speaking on national interest against India and USA from more than ten years? Do they  have speaking, convincing or analytical power and knowledge less then Zaid Hamid? Even last year Hameed Gul was threaten by Americans not to speak against Musharraf, Butto Murder and judges case. But he was not given enough chance to speak like zaid hamid on TV channels. why? He is not patriot or he has any blame in his career? Even Hameed Gul is more prominent hero of afghan Jihad then Zaid Hamid.

3- Did u ever scene a TV show on any TV channel like Zaid Hamid’s shows in which the hosts ( most of them are unknown and unskilled girls) are giving him just topic and he is only speaking, speaking more and more? In every political or current issue show host is also an anchor and discusses the matter with a strong participation, take views of viewers by live calls, letters or emails etc. We know so many famous political and defense analytical Tv shows Like Aaj Kamran Khan k sath, Mere Mutabiq, Bolta Pakistan, capital talk etc but Zaid hamid’s program seems as they want to give him more and more chance to speak without losing a single minute.

4- Have our TV channels become suddenly so patriot that they are giving their sale able time to a “ONE Man SHOW”.?

5- The host of zaid hamid’s show mostly saying him “Sir zaid hamid”. This is not usual in any TV show. U can watch many recorded shows of different anchors on youtube but you ll not get any host saying his scholar guest “ SIR” ??

After all above discussion, how can zaid hamid say that these programs are recorded by TV channels and TV channels are paying him? If not them who is sponsoring these long TV shows?

Please read all post and take decision in the light of Quran and Sunah.

Regards,

Mahmud Ayaz